Feeld was built for people who don't fit neatly into the mainstream dating app model. If you're in an open relationship, exploring polyamory, or simply curious about non-traditional connections, Feeld is the only major app that treats these as first-class use cases rather than edge cases.
In 2026, Feeld has grown to 2M+ active users and consistently ranks in the Google Play top 10 in its category. It's not a niche app anymore — but it's still a focused one.
Quick Verdict
| If you are... | Our recommendation |
|---|---|
| In an open relationship or exploring ENM | Feeld is purpose-built for you |
| Single and curious about non-traditional dating | Strong fit — 20+ orientations supported |
| A couple looking to meet others together | Feeld's shared profile feature is unique |
| Looking for casual connections in a kink-friendly space | Good fit, especially in major cities |
| Wanting a large user pool in a smaller city | Pool is thin outside major metros |
| Expecting a functional free tier | Free tier is very limited — messaging requires paid |
Overall score: 3.8 / 5 — The best app for ENM and open relationships. Free tier is restrictive, but Majestic unlocks a genuinely useful experience for the right user.
What Makes Feeld Different
Most dating apps are built around a binary: single person seeks single person. Feeld rejects this entirely.
Who Feeld is designed for:
- Singles exploring non-monogamy or ethical non-monogamy (ENM)
- Couples in open relationships looking to meet others — individually or together
- People with kink interests who want a judgment-free space
- LGBTQ+ users who want more orientation options than mainstream apps offer
What sets it apart structurally:
- Couples profiles — two people can link accounts and browse together as a unit
- 20+ gender identities and 20+ sexual orientations — more inclusive than any mainstream app
- Desire tags — you specify what you're looking for (casual, ENM, kink-friendly, etc.) upfront
- No Facebook login required — protects privacy for users who aren't publicly out about their relationship structure
Free Tier: What You Actually Get
Feeld's free tier is intentionally limited:
- Browse profiles — free
- Like profiles — free
- See who liked you — ✗ requires Majestic
- Send messages — ✗ requires Majestic
- Incognito mode — ✗ requires Majestic
- Discover (swipe mode) — limited on free
The free tier is essentially a preview. You can see who's on the app and like profiles, but you can't have a conversation without paying. This is more restrictive than Grindr, OkCupid, or Bumble's free tiers.
Majestic Subscription: Is It Worth It?
Majestic is Feeld's single paid tier. It unlocks:
- Full messaging with all matches
- See who liked you
- Incognito mode (browse without appearing in others' feeds)
- Advanced filters (age, distance, desires)
- Priority in discovery
| Plan | Monthly Rate |
|---|---|
| 1 month | ~$20/mo |
| 3 months | ~$15/mo |
| 12 months | ~$10/mo |
Pricing varies by region and device. Check in-app for your exact price.
Is it worth it? If Feeld is the right app for you — yes. The free tier is too limited to evaluate whether the app works in your area. A 1-month Majestic subscription is the minimum viable test.
If you're in a major metro (NYC, LA, London, Berlin, Sydney), the pool is dense enough to justify it. In smaller cities, check the free tier first to gauge local density before paying.
The Couples Profile Feature
Feeld's most distinctive feature: two people can link their accounts into a shared profile. The couple browses together, likes profiles together, and both partners see incoming likes.
This is genuinely useful for couples in open relationships who want to meet people together. No other mainstream app handles this as cleanly.
How it works:
- Both partners create individual Feeld accounts
- One partner sends a "link" request to the other
- Once linked, you can switch between individual and couple browsing modes
- Matches see both profiles and know they're connecting with a couple
Who Feeld Works Best For
Strong fit:
- People in open relationships, polyamorous structures, or exploring ENM
- Singles who want a kink-friendly, judgment-free space
- LGBTQ+ users who want more identity options than Hinge or Bumble offer
- Users in major metros (NYC, LA, London, Berlin, Amsterdam, Sydney)
Weaker fit:
- People looking for traditional monogamous relationships (Hinge or Match serve better)
- Users in smaller cities or rural areas (pool is too thin)
- Anyone who needs a functional free tier before committing
What Doesn't Work
The free tier is a paywall. You can browse but not connect. For a new user trying to evaluate whether Feeld has people in their area, this is a real friction point.
Pool size outside major cities. Feeld's 2M+ users are heavily concentrated in urban areas. In mid-size cities, you may see the same profiles repeatedly within days.
The interface can feel sparse. Feeld's design is minimal — some users find it clean, others find it underdeveloped compared to Hinge or Bumble.
Desire tags require honesty. The system works when users fill out their desires accurately. When people leave them vague or aspirational, the signal breaks down.
Feeld vs the Competition
| Feeld | OkCupid | Grindr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | ENM / open relationships | LGBTQ+, values matching | Gay/bi men |
| Couples profiles | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free messaging | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Orientation options | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Pool size | Small | Medium | Large (LGBTQ+) |
Pricing (Verified April 2026)
| Plan | Monthly Rate |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 (browse only) |
| Majestic 1 month | ~$20/mo |
| Majestic 3 months | ~$15/mo |
| Majestic 12 months | ~$10/mo |
Pricing varies by region and device — check in-app for your exact price.
Still Deciding?
Take our dating app quiz →. 7 questions, 30 seconds — we'll tell you whether Feeld, OkCupid, Grindr, or another app fits your relationship structure, orientation, and what you're looking for.
Pricing verified April 2026. Prices vary by region and device. This article contains affiliate links — we earn a commission if you sign up at no additional cost to you. Our recommendations are editorially independent.